Mathematical modeling of dust generation intensity during wood machining depending on cutting speed and cutting tool wear

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36930/42265214

Keywords:

mathematical modeling; wood machining; wood dust generation; cutting speed; cutting tool wear; environmental protection technologies; occupational safety; woodworking industry; regression analysis; process optimization

Abstract

The article presents the results of an experimental study and mathematical modeling of wood dust generation during mechanical wood machining. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to improve the environmental safety of woodworking production, advance environmental protection technologies, and enhance occupational safety by reducing dust generation directly in the cutting zone. The aim of the research was to determine the influence of cutting speed and cutting tool wear on wood dust generation intensity and to develop a mathematical model for predicting this process. The investigated factors were the cutting speed ranging from 40 to 80 m/s and the cutting-edge radius ranging from 10 to 50 μm, which characterizes the degree of tool wear. The experimental program was carried out using a second-order Box experimental design, while the obtained data were processed by regression analysis. The adequacy of the developed mathematical model was confirmed using Cochran’s, Student’s, and Fisher’s statistical criteria. The obtained results demonstrated that wood dust generation intensity increases with both cutting speed and cutting tool wear. The minimum dust generation intensity was 13.802 g/min at a cutting speed of 40 m/s and a cutting-edge radius of 10 μm, whereas the maximum value reached 49.782 g/min at 80 m/s and 50 μm, respectively. The developed quadratic regression model provides reliable prediction of dust generation intensity, determines rational machining conditions, and evaluates the influence of tool wear on the environmental performance of the machining process. The proposed model can be applied for optimizing cutting parameters, scheduling timely tool re-sharpening, improving dust extraction systems, reducing particulate emissions, and supporting the implementation of digital manufacturing technologies in modern woodworking enterprises. The obtained results contribute to improving production efficiency, environmental sustainability, and occupational safety in woodworking industries

References

Çakıroğlu, E. O., Demirarslan, K. O., & Taşdemir, T. (2025). Characterization of wood dust emission according to some wood species in 3D machining applied with CNC machine. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 83, 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-025-02222-2

Dolny, S., & Rogoziński, T. (2014). Air flow resistance across nonwoven filter fabric covered with microfiber layer used in wood dust separation. Drewno, 57(191), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.12841/wood.1644-3985.076.09

Huber, Yu., & et al. (2023). Analysis of implementation of Industry 4.0 principles in furniture production. Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 49, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.36930/42234906

Keller, F.-X., & Chata, F. (2018). Characterization of wood dust emission from hand-held woodworking machines. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 15(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.1368526

Kiyko, O., & et al. (2021). Post-consumer wood properties as an important factor in the quality of constructional materials. Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 23, 152–162. https://doi.org/10.15421/412135

Kiyko, O., & et al. (2025). Ecological footprint of the woodworking enterprise: Impact assessment and ways of minimization. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 35(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.36930/40350109

Kminiak, R., Kučerka, M., Krišťák, Ľ., Reh, R., Antov, P., Očkajová, A., Rogoziński, T., & Pędzik, M. (2021). Granulometric characterization of wood dust emission from CNC machining of natural wood and medium density fiberboard. Forests, 12(8), 1039. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12081039

Kyyanka, & et al. (2024). Determination of the dynamics of the formation of wood residues and waste from production activities at LLC «Fortuna-Mebli». Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 50, 103–116. https://doi.org/10.36930/42245009

Kyyanka, & et al. (2025). Development of approaches for the utilization of wood residues and waste from the processing of wood and composite structural materials in furniture manufacturing at LLC «Fortuna-Mebli». Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 51, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.36930/42255108

Kyyanka, & et al. (2025). Formation of processing pathways for wood residues in the forest sector. Forestry Education and Science: Current Challenges and Development Prospects. https://doi.org/10.36930/conf0207

Leng, J., Wang, D., Shen, W., Li, X., Liu, Q., Chen, X., Zhang, H., Liang, P., & Chen, X. (2021). Digital twins-based smart manufacturing system design in Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 60, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.05.010

Lesiv, L., & et al. (2023). Mathematical model of forecasting volumes of post-consumer wood production. Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 49, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.36930/42234903

Lesiv, L., & et al. (2024). Development of a mathematical model of the strength of joined preparations from post-consumer fir wood. Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 50, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.36930/42245002

Mračková, E., Krišťák, Ľ., Kučerka, M., Gaff, M., & Gajtanska, M. (2016). Creation of wood dust during wood processing: Size analysis, dust separation, and occupational health. BioResources, 11(1), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.1.209-222

Nasir, V., & Cool, J. (2020). A review on wood machining: Characterization, optimization, and monitoring of the sawing process. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2018.1465465

Očkajová, A., Kučerka, M., Kminiak, R., Krišťák, Ľ., Igaz, R., & Réh, R. (2020). Occupational exposure to dust produced when milling thermally modified wood. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051478

Ojima, J. (2016). Generation rate and particle size distribution of wood dust by handheld sanding operation. Journal of Occupational Health, 58(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.16-0136-BR

Orikhovskyy, R., & et al. (2024). Determination of running time losses in automated processing systems of woodworking. Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 50, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.36930/42245003

Orikhovskyy, R., & et al. (2025). Choice of the sequence of productivity of machining in automated production systems of the woodworking manufacturing. Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 51, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.36930/42255105

Pędzik, M., Rogoziński, T., Očkajová, A., Kučerka, M., Kminiak, R., & Júda, M. (2021). Fine dust creation during hardwood machine sanding. Applied Sciences, 11(14), 6602. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146602

Petryshak, I., & et al. (2020). Study of the influence of breed and grinding modes on the specific productivity of grinding skin. Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 46, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.36930/42204601

Petryshak, I., & et al. (2021). Determination of the influence of rock and grinding modes on the surface rough-ness of wood. Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 47, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.36930/42214701

Rabiei, F., & Souri, S. (2024). Investigation of computer numerical control wood milling parameters for occupationally safer by the minimization of produced wood dust. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 19(3), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2023.2286624

Ratnasingam, J., Scholz, F., & Natthondan, V. (2010). Particle size distribution of wood dust in rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis) furniture manufacturing. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 68(2), 241–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-009-0369-2

Salapak, L., & et al. (2021). Determination of an efficient technological process of manufacturing various support elements for functional surfaces. Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 47, 58–72. https://doi.org/10.36930/42214708

Simon, C., Donnot, A., & Méausoone, P.-J. (2022). Indoor wood dust analysis during machining with an original experimental device. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 80, 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-021-01764-5

Singer, H., İlçe, A. C., Şenel, Y. E., & Burdurlu, E. (2024). Artificial neural network-based prediction model to minimize dust emission in the machining process. Safety and Health at Work, 15(3), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2024.06.006

Somar, G., & et al. (2022). The chemical nature of pollutants as a basis for the classification of wood products to be utilization. Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 48, 13-26. https://doi.org/10.36930/42214802

Ugulino, B., & Hernández, R. E. (2016). Assessment of surface properties and solvent-borne coating performance of red oak wood produced by peripheral planing. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 74, 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-016-1090-6

Ugulino, B., & Hernández, R. E. (2017). Effect of cutting parameters on dust emission and surface roughness during helical planing red oak wood. Wood and Fiber Science, 49(3), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1163/21650373-00002196

Vasic, S., & Stanzl-Tschegg, S. (2007). Experimental and numerical investigation of wood fracture mechanisms at different humidity levels. Holzforschung, 61(3), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2007.056

Xu, W., Wu, Z., Lu, W., Yu, Y., Wang, J., Zhu, Z., & Wang, X. (2022). Investigation on cutting power of wood–plastic composite using response surface methodology. Forests, 13(9), 1397. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091397.

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

Somar, G., & Sen, O. (2026). Mathematical modeling of dust generation intensity during wood machining depending on cutting speed and cutting tool wear. Forestry, Forest, Paper and Woodworking Industry, 52, 187-202. https://doi.org/10.36930/42265214

Similar Articles

1-10 of 250

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.